Pay-as-you-drive makes sense
People who drive less should pay less
By The Providence Journal
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
One motorist drives 5,000 miles a year.
STORY TOOLS
More Your Take
- It's time for TV cameras in Supreme Court
- Al Franken's Senate initiation
- I'm Not There: Settling in, or trying to, at least
Share and Enjoy [?]
Another car owner -- same age, gender, driving record, vehicle and neighborhood -- puts in 15,000 miles.
Now, why should the first individual pay the same for car insurance as the second?
After all, the more miles one drives, the greater the risk of accidents and the greater risk to the insurer who bears the cost.
There's no logical reason for it. That's just the way car insurance has been written.
But in 34 states, motorists who drive relatively little can buy insurance at lower premiums that reflect their lower risk. This kind of coverage is called "pay-as-you-drive" auto insurance, and it should be available everywhere.
Insurance companies like it because it helps them better gauge the odds that a customer will get into an accident. But environmentalists also approve of pay-as-you-drive because it rewards people who drive less and gives an incentive for others to cut down on their mileage. The result is reduced emissions of smog and planet-warming gases.
The potential dollar savings are impressive. A retiree near Orlando, Fla., told the Los Angeles Times that he saved $634 a year on insurance for his two vehicles by switching to a pay-as-you-drive policy. Gasoline and insurance are the two biggest expenses of owning a car, and with this kind of insurance, driving less reduces both costs.
In addition to cutting pollution, a nationwide availability of pay-as-you-drive insurance would offer other big payoffs for the society at large, according to a study by the Brookings Institution. Fewer miles driven would mean fewer accidents, less traffic and reduced reliance on foreign oil. Brookings places a value on these benefits at $52 billion a year.
We urge insurance regulators to encourage this sensible type of coverage. So many drivers travel small distances, and there's no reason why they shouldn't benefit from that fact.

Comments