CU News

CU's College Democrats oppose hiring of right-wing prof

Boulder campus still raising money for 'conservative thought' chair

Monday, January 12, 2009

Fresh off last fall’s historic push to help elect Barack Obama, the University of Colorado’s College Democrats have set their sights on a new target: the school’s plans to bring a professor of conservative thought to campus.

CU leaders last year announced plans to create a $9 million endowment to fund the Visiting Chair in Conservative Thought and Policy on the Boulder campus, which long has been derided as a liberal bastion.

So far, CU only has raised $575,000 in private funds toward that goal, campus officials said Monday.

But regardless of how long it may take the university to fully fund the conservative post, College Democrats say they’re not going to wait to launch a campaign against it.

“The entire concept of a Visiting Chair in Conservative Thought and Policy politicizes academics in a way that is contrary to the university’s mission,” senior Jesse Jensen, president of the College Democrats, said Monday. “By endowing a chair in one specific political ideology, we are not promoting intellectual diversity — we are tokenizing a point of view that should be presented in all classes on political thought.”

CU spokesman Bronson Hilliard said endowed chairs are nothing new in the realm of academic instruction, and the Visiting Chair in Conservative Thought and Policy has been discussed on campus for years and has received support from a wide spectrum of faculty members and administrators.

The program, supported by Chancellor G.P. “Bud” Peterson, would invite renowned scholars in the field of conservative thought to CU to serve annual residencies and preside over the discussion of the political ideology’s role in any number of academic disciplines.

“People need to understand what this is before they oppose it in a knee-jerk way,” Hilliard said. “The concept of the endowed chair is to bring in a conservative scholar — not an activist — who has been classically trained, holds an advanced degree and has studied the impact of conservative thought on history, politics and economics.”

Opposing the chair before it’s even been endowed, let alone filled, is premature and unwarranted, Hilliard said, because there are no stipulations requiring those who fill the chair to be aligned with the right.

“It isn’t a requirement that this scholar is even conservative,” Hilliard said. “We have French teachers who aren’t from France . . . We are simply looking to improve intellectual diversity on campus.”

The College Democrats’ Jensen, however, said that if CU is looking to improve academic diversity, creating an endowed chair for conservative professors is going about it in the wrong way.

“One-sided politics have no place in the academic world,” Jensen said. “Our faculty understands that and so do our student leaders. If students want conservative thought, they need only speak up during any political science class and they are bound to find a vocal member of the Republican Party willing to offer a retort.”

Sophomore Gregory Carlson, one such outspokenly conservative member of the student body, said he supports the endowed chair as an effort to help combat the left-leaning bias he believes is prevalent in campus classrooms.

“In my personal experience, there is ample opportunity for students to see the liberal philosophy on matters,” Carlson said. “But I think it’s important for students to see every part of the picture when coming up with opinions about the world.”

Comments

Posted by Kaiyan on January 13, 2009 at 9:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I don't see much academic use for this seat - aside from maybe a feel-good councilor for conservative students having a hard time dealing with life on a "liberal" campus. Sounds to me like a nice posh position to put a buddy that's "not necessarily right wing" into for a fat check.

Posted by Ajudoka on January 13, 2009 at 1:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)

So much for diversity. Liberals demand diversity as long as it agrees with their own views. Try bringing true diverse opinions or thoughts anywhere near them and they try to censor it. If you can't compete in the intellectual arena, please don't claim you're in favor of openness and freedom of speech. At least be honest about it and tell people you don't want to hear anything that might be outside your very narrow view of the world.

Posted by jdenton on January 13, 2009 at 2:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Well in all fairness they're just college kids. Their political mindset in its entirely has been formed within the past 18 to 24 months max and the idea that there has been roughly 10,000 years of political and social constructs that were not "green", "pro choice", "anti-war" or "for change" as defined by contemporary western culture would completely mystify them. What limited knowledge they do have has been spoon fed to them in discrete packets just large enough to briefly occupy a few neurons in idle state between their next cell phone call, iTunes download or Wii game. All this coupled with the 20 years +/- of indoctrination they've received in the virtue of "individual thought" whether or not it's rooted in any fact forms the basis for some pretty powerful closed-mindedness. The sad thing is that the concept of reasoned, respectful political discourse is also lost on them - hence their only remedy for something they disagree with is to form a "campaign" against it and perpetuate the false dichotomy of "us vs. them". Whatever gets you more friends on MySpace, I suppose.

Posted by curtisreed on January 13, 2009 at 2:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)

As a CU Boulder Alum, and a former radical liberal, I totally support the initiative to bring a conservative professor to Boulder. Back in "the day", I hated the "neocons", just like every other "good little liberal"--which is the vast majority of students and faculty in Boulder. The notion that there is already a balance of viewpoints is patently false.

I once took a CU course called "Great thinkers of the 20th Century". I thought it would be a philosophy class that would encompass a wide gamut of thought. Nope. 100% of the "great thinkers" were Marxists. I wouldn't have minded if the class had been named "Marxist Intellectuals of the 20th Century". But it was a "bait and switch" situation, in which the communist professor was trying to brainwash his students.

In all of the Education courses, it was clear that ONLY liberal approaches to education were accepted. Traditional teaching methods were TABOO.

Women's Studies are all liberal courses. Do you think Chicano studies is conservative? Even English courses tend to be deconstructivist and anti-establishmentarian in philosophy. My Spanish Literature classes promoted poetry and essays by leftists, not once from conservatives. My history classes were all taught by radical leftists: the standard textbooks were always supplemented with books by leftists such as Howard Zinn or Noam Chomsky. But never by conservative intellectuals.

Conservative thought was a thing almost unknown to me until I graduated and fled The People's Republic of Boulder.

And guess what happened? Exposure to a real good job and true diversity taught me that NO ONE has a monopoly on reason, and that goes doubly for the liberals who say they want "diversity" as long it that means "liberals of all colors."

Posted by Ozark_Sunshine on January 14, 2009 at 7:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Of course they are against it. Because they are afraid of the truth. What liars and hypocrites. They call for tolerance and understanding, yet give none. When faced with the facts, they lie, scream, shout down, protest and try to intimidate those who disagree with them. They are like children throwing temper tantrums. They actually hate anyone who disagrees with their Koolaid drinking thoughts. There has not been honest discourse on college campuses in years because of the radicals teaching there. When I went back to college in the 80s and 90s after serving in the military, I blew the liberals arguments out of the water with the truth and these professors tried to flunk me for it. Fortunately the Deans saw through their ruse and told them they needed to get out of academia and out into the real world. It is time to take our education system back and send the Saul Alinsky's, Bill Ayer's and Ward Churchills out to the unemployment lines where they belong. Democrats, try honest conversation for one instead of stifling dissent and maybe you'll gain some credibility.

Posted by SammHill on January 14, 2009 at 8:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)

The Left is very smart to oppose this chair.

It only takes one drop of chlorine to disinfect a huge amount of sewage. With the addition of this one chair, the eyes of thousands of students will be opened. STOP IT NOW!

Posted by SkyTrooper on January 14, 2009 at 9:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)

More Liberal Fascism, silence all who oppose you… Hitler would be proud of the socialist democrat party.

Posted by carol5567 on January 14, 2009 at 10:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I think this article is related to the "Student Voice" column:
"Buffs fans lack class"
Wake up, Boulder! Where are your everyday choices taking you?

Posted by Kaiyan on January 14, 2009 at 3:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)

The Left and Right have little to argue over though - they need 9 million and have raised just over half of one in a year. With that type of popular response they are on track to have the seat created and filled in 2024. By then what we consider modern conservative "thought" will be history, and truly worthy of study.

Meanwhile there are several worthy programs and departments on campus that lack political bias and are horribly underfunded. I bet 9 million would go a long way to improving those programs and raising the school a few ranks nationally.