NEW HAVEN, Conn. â The attorney general of Connecticut said Saturday that he is asking American International Group Inc. why documents appear to show the company paid $53 million more in bonuses to its financial products division than previously reported.

Documents turned over late Friday show AIG paid $218 million in bonuses last weekend, higher than the $165 million that was previously disclosed, said the office of Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, who had issued a subpoena.

Bonuses were “showered like confetti” on AIG employees, Blumenthal said.

AIG had previously disclosed that the company was contractually obligated to pay a total of about $165 million of previously awarded “retention pay” to employees in the financial products unit, based in Connecticut, by March 15. It said another $55 million in retention pay had already been distributed to about 400 AIG Financial Products employees.

That total of $220 million is about $2 million more than the figure disclosed Friday, and Blumenthal said he was seeking clarification from the company on whether the new papers differ from what was previously reported.

“Unless the number can be explained, it will undercut any lingering rationale the company may have for these unjustified payments,” Blumenthal told The Associated Press on Saturday.

AIG spokesman Mark Herr declined to comment.

The newly released documents show that the nation’s largest insurer, which has received $182.5 billion in federal money to keep it from failing, paid bonuses of more than $1 million to 73 employees, with five of them getting bonuses more than $4 million, Blumenthal said.

The company did not release the names of the employees, citing worker safety.

“The initial number was so outrageous that it will further fuel the justified anger and revulsion that people feel,” Blumenthal said. “It simply shows how these people should been shoved out the door, not showered with cash.”

News of the bonuses last week ignited a firestorm, and even some death threats. Congress began action on a bill that would tax 90 percent of the bonuses, and the company’s chief executive urged anyone who received more than $100,000 to return at least half.

Activists are expected to rally at AIG’s Wilton office on Saturday to protest the bonuses. A busload are also touring some AIG executives’ homes in Connecticut, organizers said.

Archived comments

The use of the tax code as an extra-judicial weapon to strike disfavored individuals retroactively is creepy.

The bonuses stink, but they were contractual employment oligiations in a nation that respects contract law.

If we are going to play faux-morality-populist theater with their passing of a 90% retroactive tax on AIG bonus payments, every Senator and House member should also give back every dime they have received in contributions from AIG.

slehan@aupairint.com

3/21/2009 12:03:28 PM

Does article 1 section 9 of the constitution prohibit laws like that?

nelsonis@earthlink.net

3/21/2009 1:25:17 PM

I agree.The bonuses make me boil.But, the really bad part about it, was our government representatives wrote that as OK in the stimulus bill.They are using law to cover their butts and redirect the real issue.That is plain wrong.

If there is to be a recovery of money, I think the representatives should cover it out of their political funding…and then be jailed or fired / impeached for directly lying to the public and the rest of the congress.They scream accountability as long as it does not apply to them.

I am to the point to start the rally cry of taking them all out of office and starting fresh.

randysom@yahoo.com

3/21/2009 2:05:09 PM

doesn’t obama want to break mortgage contracts.

how are the teacher’s union and other public employees going like their retirement going down as they are invested in mortgages. contractual obligated to a pension, no problem, rewrite the contract.

malohovno

3/21/2009 4:05:35 PM